Thoughts on a Lutheran Identity Vs. a Lutheran Confession

The following are my personal thoughts concerning the 2025 Texas District Convention Resolution 02-03-25: To Define and Affirm Lutheran Identity.

I am against the resolution. To quote from the resolution, “The Lutheran Church is not defined by cultural or national identity but by its confession of Christ and the pure teaching of His Gospel. To be Lutheran is to confess what the Scriptures teach and what the Church has always believed.” – Herman Sasse, Here We Stand: Nature and Character of the Lutheran Faith.

Unfortunately the overuse of the word “identity” has almost emptied it of its meaning. With that said, there is a distinct and great difference between one’s “identity” and one’s “confession.” Today anyone may identify as just about anything, a woman may identify as a man (however that does not change her XX chromosome to XY) and a man may identify as a woman (again that does not change his XY chromosomes to XX), and yet neither identity is true or real.

In the Lutheran Church and in our Confessions we do not use the term “identity,” but we use the word “confession” because to have a confession means so much more than simply to have an identity. To have a confession means that one not only confesses with their lips, but believes in their heart and that belief is then acted out and seen in their life. Thus, a true confession is a combination of faith and life or better said, doctrine and practice. For one to practice something different than their doctrine or to simply say they identify as something means that they are truly not confessing. As mamma always said, “Practice what you preach.” Or as we hear today, “If you’re gonna talk the talk, then you better walk the walk.”

Unfortunately, this denominational identity seems to be as divisive as identity politics. Also, as memory serves, it was during the Seminary Walkout that the one group wanted to have a Lutheran “identity” very much like we heard in recent times from Concordia Austin. Yet, simply to have a Lutheran “identity” does not mean one is a confessional Lutheran. One example of how this is happening and is so divisive in our synod today is what happens on Sunday mornings. Back in the early 1980s this Texas District was involved in the Chuck and Win Arn Church Growth movement. That movement defined what was done on Sunday morning as worship and suggested that in worship God was the audience, the congregation were the actors, the pastor and choir were the prompters, thus, if not outright stating, it was implied that people were to attend worship in order to do something for God and thus needed to have a part in the worship service, such as read the lessons, be in the praise band or the drama team, etc. As confessional Lutherans we understand that what we do on Sunday morning is Divine Service wherein God is the actor and the congregation are the ones being acted on and given to, such that the called and ordained pastor is the one through which God works to deliver the gifts He has to give and the laity are there to be given to. The response of the laity is simply to offer hymns (good sound theological hymns), offer prayers, and offer their firstfruits and tithes (which were hopefully the same). So, we see in this example the difference between an identity and a true confession which is acted out.

Finally, to quote again from the resolution, “The Lutheran Church is not defined by cultural or national identity but by its confession of Christ and the pure teaching of His Gospel. To be Lutheran is to confess what the Scriptures teach and what the Church has always believed.” - Herman Sasse, Here We Stand: Nature and Character of the Lutheran Faith. Notice the difference in the words, identity and confession. So, to simply identify as a Lutheran does not make one a Lutheran. Only to confess with the lips and live that confession makes one a true Lutheran.